Volume 7, Issue 4, July 2019, Page: 107-115
Theoretical Annotation of China's National Audit System Change
Kangli Liao, Accounting College, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang City, China
Feng Wang, Accounting College, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang City, China
Received: Jul. 4, 2019;       Accepted: Jul. 26, 2019;       Published: Aug. 13, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.jfa.20190704.11      View  114      Downloads  26
Abstract
Economic interests (economic rationality) and political interests (political rationality) are the dual goals pursued by political state in promoting structural reform. Improving the independence of the national audit as the premise in the national audit system reform, simultaneously not challenging the existing political system, in this paper we construct Pareto Optimality Model with “independence” and “political control ability” as the basic variables and “political state-economic society” as the basic stakeholders with dichotomy, draw Pareto Optimality interval of “political control ability” under the condition of considering transaction costs. Based on stakeholders formed by the national audit system reform in the past 30 years, we further decompose and integrate the stakeholders with dichotomy, and construct a dynamic model of the national audit system reform with the central government, local interest groups and the public as stakeholders, thus to explain theoretically the reform course of national audit system. As fundamental reform in the national audit system that exceeds the constraints of political system and historical tradition is unlikely to occur in a short time, in this paper we put forward promoting the internal optimization of national audit system under the existing political system framework to realize the interaction between good governance of the state and good performance of the national audit.
Keywords
National Audit, National Audit System, Pareto Optimality, National Governance, Institutional Change
To cite this article
Kangli Liao, Feng Wang, Theoretical Annotation of China's National Audit System Change, Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019, pp. 107-115. doi: 10.11648/j.jfa.20190704.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
North, D. C, (1973). The rise of the western world: A new economic history, Cambridge University Press.
[2]
North, D. C, (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Noth, (1991). Structure and changes in economic history, Sanlian Bookstore Shanghai Branch.
[4]
Wei Zhang, (2010). The change of public opinion system: the possibility and limitation of empiricism transformation, The 10th China Institutional Economics Annual Meeting.
[5]
Xiaoping Deng, (1994). Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping (Volume II), People's Publishing House.
[6]
Jiayi Liu, (2012). On State Governance and State Auditing, Chinese Social Sciences No. 6, pp: 60-72, 206.
[7]
Stevens, (1999). Collective Choice Economics, Shanghai People's Publishing House.
[8]
Dianhua Zhu, (2019). The Audit Management System Reform under the Background of the Establishment of the Central Audit Committee: Logic and Method [J]. Hubei University of Economics, Volume17, No. 2, pp: 93-99.
[9]
North, (1995). Outline of the Theory of Institutional Change, Reform, No. 3, pp: 94-98.
[10]
Huai Li, Wei Deng, (2013). Subject theory innovation of institutional change and its related reaction research, Economist, No. 9, pp: 34-42.
[11]
Junwei Lu, Hong Yin, (2012). The Dynamic Mechanism and Analysis Model of Government Accounting Reform——Based on the Theoretical Perspective of Institutional Change. Accounting Research, No. 2, pp: 57-64.
[12]
Rongsheng Qin, (2004). Public Responsibility Economic Responsibility Theory and China's Government Audit Reform, Audit Research, No. 6, pp: 16-20.
[13]
Ping Yin, (2001). The trade-offs and reforms of the current national audit system, Audit research, No. 4, pp: 43-46, 52.
[14]
Suchang Yang, Zezhong Xiao, (2004). On the reform of China's national audit "dual track system", Audit and economic research, No. 1, pp: 5-9.
[15]
Shuguang Ma, (2006). Political System, Historical Tradition and Chinese Government Audit System Selection [J]. Auditing and Economic Research, No. 6, pp: 9-13.
[16]
Taijun Jin, (2018). Consulting Democracy: Cognition and Construction in the Reform of National Audit System [J]. Learning and Exploration, No. 10, pp: 66-71+191-192.
[17]
Peter Dickens, (2005). Social Darwinism, Jilin People's Publishing House.
[18]
Jiaxin Wang, Shiqiao Zheng, Ping Yin, (2015). National Auditing is the Foundation and Important Guarantee of State Governance: Theoretical Framework and Practice Analysis [J]. Audit Research, No. 06, pp: 3-8.
[19]
Lihong Chen, Longping Zhang, Haiyan Zhu, (2016). Can national audit play an anti-corruption role? [J]. Audit Research, No. 03, pp: 48-55.
[20]
Dasheng Dong, (2018). State, State Governance and State Audit: An Analysis Based on Marxist State View and China's National Conditions [J]. Audit Research, No. 05, pp: 3-11.
[21]
Baohou Sun, (2018). Reflections on Several Issues Concerning the Audit of Socialist Countries with Chinese Characteristics in the New Era [J]. audit research, No. 04, pp: 3-6.
[22]
Jiayi Liu, (2012). On State Governance and State Audit [J]. China Social Sciences, No. 06, pp: 60-72+206.
Browse journals by subject